7 MARCH 25, 1971 Manipur Budget and Demands 72 44.25 brs. MANIPUR BUDGET, 1971-72— GENERAL DISCUSSION, *DEMANDS FOR GRANTS ON ACCOUNT (MANIPUR), 1970-71, AND *DEMANDS FOR SUPPLEMEN- TARY GRANTS (MANIPUR), I97!-72 MR. CHAIRMAN : We shall now take up items a 12 and 3 of the Order paper, namely, general discussion on the budget of the Union Territory of Manipur for 197)-72, and discussion and voting on the demands for grants on account as well as Supplemen- tary demands for grants in respect of the Union Territory of Manipur. Demand No. I-—Land Reveoue MR, CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 7,130,000, be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union Territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment durirg the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 972, m respect of Land Revenue." Demand No 2- State Excise MR. CHAIRMAN Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs 86,000 be granted to the Presideit, an accuunt out of the Consolidated Fund of Union Territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the chargcs which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, in respect of State ‘Excise’.”” Demand No, 3---Taxes oo Vehictes MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 38,000 ह... granted to the President, on account out of the Consulidated Fund of Union Territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come m course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, m respect of ‘Taxes on Vehicles’.” Demand No, 4—Sales Tax MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 36,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union Territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist dav of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Sates Tax’.” Demand No. 5—Other Taxes and Duties MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 4,000, be granted to the President, om account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union Terrntory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the sear ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Other Faxes and Dutes’.” Demand No. 6--Stamps MR, CHAIRMAN Motion moved “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 9,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consohdated Fund af Union Territery of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will comme in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day af March, 1972, अलग ही respect of ‘Stamps’. Demand No. 7 Registration MR, CHAIRMAN . Motion moved “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 28,000 be granted to the President, om account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union Territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3st day of Match, 1972, in respect of ‘Registration’.” Demand No. §~-Parliament, State and Union Territories Legislature MR. CHAIRMAN : Moiion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 382,008 be granted to the President, ग्या *Moved with the recommendation of the President. १5 Manirur Budget and vn account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union Territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3lst day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Parliament, State and Union Territories Legislature’.” Demand No. 9- -General Administration Demand co 110 MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not _— exceeding Rs. 32,32,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Tund of Union Territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in: course of payment during the year ending on the Stot day of March, 1972, छह respect of ‘Cieneral Administration’,”* Adminsstraticn at Justice MR. CHAIRMAN ; Motion moved “That a sum not — erceeding Rs. 458.090 be granted fo the President, on aicount out of the Cansolidated fund of Union Termiary of Manipur for oor towards defraying the charges whi will cume in couse of payment during the vear ending on the 34st day of March, 1972, 11 respect of ‘Adnunis- tration of Justice’ " Demand No. t!- Jaifs MR. CHAIRMAN Motion moved “That 8 sum not exceeding Rs. 1,86,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union Territory of Mampur for or towards defraying the charges which will come ia course of payment during the year ending on the 3tst day of March, 1972, in respect of *Jails’,”’ Demand No. 32---Police MR. CHAIRMAN Motion moved : “That ai sum not exceeding Rs. 1,12,20,000 1... granted to the Presi- dent, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union Territory of Manipur for or towards defraving the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3lst day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Police’.” CHAITRA 4, 893 (SAKA) Demands 74 Demand No. 3--Civil Supplies MR, CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 83,000 be granted to the President, On account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union Territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, 2 द in respect of ‘Civil Supplies’. Demand No. 14- Education MR, CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 1,54,16,000 be granted to the Presi- dent, on account out of the Consolidated Jund of tnion ‘Territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges whith will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Edu- vas cation. Demand No, 15— Medical MR. CHAIRMAN ; Motion moved : “That a sum not — exceeding Rs. 27,87,000, be granted to the President, ी accout out of the Cunsolidated fund of Gnion Territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3lst day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Medical’.” Demand No. !6—Public Health MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum ‘not — exceeding Rs. 16,54,000, ह, granied to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Public Health’.” Demand No. WT Agriculture and Fisheries MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum = not exceeding Rs. 14,82,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will 78 Manipur Budget and {Mr. Chairman] come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3{st day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Agriculture and Fisheries’.”’ Demand No. 8—-Animal Husbandry MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved “That a sum not exceeding Rs, 8,28,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the «harges which will come in course of payment durine the year ending on the 3tst day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Animal Husbandry’.”’ Demand No. 9---Co-operation MR. CHAIRMAN Motion moved “That ai sum not excceding Rs. 4,02,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory off Manipur for or towards defraymy the charges winch will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3st day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Co-operation’ Demand No, 20—- Industries MR, CHAIRMAN Motion moved “That aioosum not exceeding Rs. 8,47,000 be granted to the President, on accounf out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for ur towards defraying the charges “hich will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Industries’.” ’ Demand Ne. 2i--Community Development MR CHA.RMAN: Motion moved : “That a sum = not — exceeding Rs, 8,81,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in coures of payment during the year ending on the 3lst day of March, 4972, in respect of ‘Community Develop- ment’.”* Demand No, 22-—Labour MR. CHAIRMAN: Motion moved ; “That a sum not exceeding MARCH 25, 1971 Demands १6 Rs. 4,55,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union ternitory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 4972, in respect of “Labour’,’, Demand No. 23 Statistics MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved “That a sum not exceading Rs. 2,20,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union ternitary of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come In course of payment during the year ending on the 14% day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Statistics’ ay Demand No. uw Irrigation MR CHAIRMAN Motion moved “That 4 sum not exceeding Ros. 283,000 be granted to the President, on at. ount out ot the Comolhdated Fund of Umon territery of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will came in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Irrigation’.” Demand No Be Electricity MR CHAIRMAN. Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 25,18,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Mampur for or towards defraymg the charges which will come in course of payment durmg the year endmg on the 3/st day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Electricty’.” Demand No, 26—Public Works (Original Works and Repairs) MR, CHAIRMAN : Motion moved: “Thet a sum not exceeding Rs. 31,31,000 be granted to the President, on atcotat aut of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3Ist day of March, 1972, in tespect of ‘Public Works (Original Works and Reprirs)’.” 7 Manipur Budget and CHAITRA 4, 3893 (SAKA) Demand No. 27-—-Public Works (Establish- ments) MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not = exceedmg Rs. 56,40,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, i972, in respect of ‘Public Work Establishment)’.”’ Demand No 28- Road Transport MR, CHAIRMAN Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs, 21,81,000 be granted to the President, on a count ont of the Consolidated Fund of Umon territory of Manipur for or towaras defraying the charges which will cnme in course of payment during the vear ending on the 3Ist day of March, 1972, m respect of ‘Road Transport’ Te Demand No, 29--Famine MR. CHAIRMAN Motion moved “That a sum not exceediag Rs. £7,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Unton territory of Matupnr for or towards defraying the charges which will come m course of payment during the year end- ing on the 3st day of March, 1972, in ey respect of ‘Famine’. Demand No. x Pensions and other Retire- ment Benefits. MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Ra. 4,22,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipu: for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Pensions and other Retirement Benefits'.”’ Demand No. 34--Stationery and Printing MR, CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 2,56,000 be granted to the President, on account Demands 78 out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3lst day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Stationery and Printing’.” Demand No, 32-—Forest MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 5,93,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the ycar ending on the 389 day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Forest’.” Demand No. 33--Miscellaneous MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “Fhat a sum not exceeding २५. I9,62,000 be granted to the President, on account our of Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year end- ing on the 3\st day of March, 1972, in + oP respect of ‘Miscellaneous’. Demand No 34 -Capital Outlay on Public Heaith MR CHAIRMAN Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 4,17,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Capital Out- Jay on Public Health’.” Demand No, 35-—Capital Outlay on Mitior Irrigation MR, CHAIRMAN : Motion moved ; “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 2,53,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Union terriiory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Capital Out- Jay on Minor Irrigation’.” 79 Manipur Budget and {Mr. Chairman] Detiand No. 36—-Capital Outlay on Flood Control MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not — exceeding Rs. 6,67,000 कद pranted to the President, on accoum out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year endmig on the 38 day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Capical Out- lay on Flood Control’.” Demand No 37- Capital Outlay on Electri- city MR. CHAIRMAN) Motion moved “That ai sum not exceeding Rs. 35,57,000 be granted to the Presi- dent, on account out of the Consolidated Fund of Umon territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the Jist dav of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Capital Out- lay on Fleeticity'.” Demand No. 38. Capital Outlay on Roads MR, CHAIRMAN Motion moved. “That ao osum nol exceeding Rs. 68,33,000 be granted te the Presi- dent, on arcount ou! of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defrayiig the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Capital Out- lay on Roads’.” Dearand No, 30 Capital Outlay on Buildings MR, CHAIRMAN Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding , Rs, 26,19,000 be granted to the Presi- dent, on account out of the Consoh- dated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, in respect of ‘Capital Outlay on Buildings’,” Demand No. 46--Capital Outlay on Road Transport MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding MARCH 235, 1971 Demand No, 43--Capital Demands 80 Rs. 4,00,000 96 granted to the Presi- dent, on account out of the Consoli- dated Fund of Uion territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the Jist day of March, 1972, ia respect of ‘Capital Outlay on Road Transport’. Demand No. 4t Capital Outlay on State Trading MR, CHAIRMAN Motion moved “That a sum = not exceeding Rs 29,072,000, be granted to the Prea- dent, on account out of the Consol dated fund of Union territory of Manipur for or tovards defrasing the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, का respect of > ‘Capital Outhsy on State Trading’. Demand No 42 Capital Outly on Indus- tries MR CHAIRMAN : Motion moved “That a sum not exceeding करेब 3,393,000 be granted to the President, on account out of the Combolidated Fund of Umon territory of Manipur for ot towards defraying the charges whieh will come in course of payment during the year ending on the यक day of March, #972, in respect of ‘Capital Ont- vt lay on Industries’. Ontley on Co- operation MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a sum not exceeding Rs. 69,000 फट prunted to the President, on eccountt out of the Consolidated Fund of Union territory of Manipur for ot towards defraying the charges which wil come in course of payment during the yoar ending on the 3ist day of March, 1972, it resnect of ‘Capital Outlay on Co-operation’,” Demand No. 44— Loans and Advances MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That ai sum not exceeding Rs, 5,I2,000 be granted to the Presi- dent, on account out of the Coneoli- dated Fund of Unjon territory of है Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which will come im oourse of payment during the year ending on 3]st day of March, 1972, im respect of “Ionns ‘and Advances’.” Demand No. —-Land Revenue MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not ex- ceeding Rs. 28,900 be granted to the President out of the ‘Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which wifl come in course of payment during the year end- ing the है 101 day of March, 1971, in res- pect of ‘Land Revenue’.” Nemand No 4 Sales Tax MR CHAIRMAN Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not ex- ceeding Rs 4,400 पद granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union temtery of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year end- ing the 11 day of March, 297!, in res- pect of ‘Sales Tar'.” Demand No § Other Taxes and Duties MR, CHAIRMAN Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum act ex- ceeding Rs. 300 be granted to the Presi- dent out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come im course of payment during the year end- ing the वे day of March, 97l, in res- pect of ‘Other Taxes and Duties’.” Demand No 7 Registration MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : ‘That a Supplementary sum not ex- eemting Rs. 4,900 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union termtory of Manipur to defray the chargés which will come in course of payment during the ycar end- ing the Bist day of March, #97l, in res- eos pect of Registration’, Demand No, 9— General Administration MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “Phat a Supplementary sym not Manipur Budget and CHAITRA 4, 3878 (SAKA) Demands 82 exceeding Rs. 964,900 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union Territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in cotrse of payment during the year ending the 3Ist day of March, 97], in respect of ‘General Administration’.” Bemand No. f0—Administration of Justice MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 83,860 ह... granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 1971, in at respect of ‘Administration of Justice’. Demand No ti—Jails MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum_ not exceeding Rs 41,85,000. be granted to the President out of the Cansolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3Ist day of March, 97t, in vo respect of ‘Jails’, Demand No. 2—Police MR CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplemeitary sum not exceeding Rs. 48, 13,400 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union terriory of Manipur to defry the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 1971, in respect of ‘Police’.”” Demand No. 43-—Civil Supplies MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 2,100 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in sourse of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 4971, in reapect of ‘Civil Supplics’ 83 Manipur Budget and Demand No, {4—Education MR, CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 35,54,800 be graited to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in sourse of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 97I, in respect of ‘Education'."* Demand No. 5—-Medical MR, CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 6,15,600, छह granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 1971, in respect of ‘Medical’,”* Demand No, 6—Public Health MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 1,18,600 ८ granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 1971, in respect of ‘Public Health’.” Demand No. 8-——-Animal Husbandry MR, CHAIRMAN Mation moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 2,77,200 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 1971, in respect of ‘Animal Husba idry’.”” Demand No. 20—Iodustries MR. CHAIRMAN : Mation moved : “That @ supplementary mm _ not exceeding Rs. 4,77,300 ह. 4 granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in gpuree of payment during the yeas MARCH 25, 397i Demands 84 exuding the 3ist day of March, 1971, in respect of ‘Industries’."* Demand No. 2]—Conununity Development MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 2,86,000 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3{st day of March, 1971, in respect of ‘Community Development’.” Demand No. 23—Statistics MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 1,05,600 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment durmg the year ending the 3lst day of March, 97] in respect of ‘Statstics’.”’ Demand No. 24~-Irrigation MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 1,80,000, be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, t97!, in tespect of ‘frrigation’.”* Demand No. 25—Electricity MR, CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 1,05,200. be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3788 day of March, 97I, in respect of ‘Electricity’.” Demand No. 26~—Public Works (Original Works and Repatrs) MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moyed : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 22,06,400 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund 85 of the Union territory of Manipur to deftay the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 1971, in respect of ‘Public works (Original Works and Repairs)’.”’ Demand No. 27—Public Works (Estts.) MR, CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. !7,!7,I00 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 1971, in respect of ‘Public Works (Estts.)’.” Demand No 28-—Road Transport MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 1,67,100 1०. granted to the President out uf the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 97I, in respect of ‘Road Transport’.” Demand No. 30-- Pension and other Retire- ment Benefits MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 5,68,400 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Umon territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3Ist day of March, 1971, in respect of ‘Pensions and other Retire- ment Benefits’.” Demand No. 3l--Stationery and Printing MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 29,000 फट granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3tat day of Merch, 1971, in sespect of ‘Stationery and Printing’.” Monipur Budget and | CHAITRA 4, 893 (SAKA) Demands 86 Demand No. 32-~Forest MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 74,700 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3Ist day of March, 1971, in tespect of ‘Forest’.”” Demand No. 33-—-Miscellaneous MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved ; “That a Supplementary sum _ not exceeding Ks. 1,00,000 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Mampur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 1971, ia respect of ‘Miscellaneous’.” Demand No. 36—Capital Outiay on Flood Control MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 2,00,000 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3Jst day of March, 1971, in respect of ‘Capital Outlay on Flood Control’.” Demand No. 38—Capital Outlay on Roads MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplomentary sum not exceeding Rs. 29,00,700 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 1971, in respect of ‘Capital Outlay on Roads’.” Demand No. 44—~Loans and Advances MR. CHAIRMAN : Motion moved : “That a Supplementary sum not exceeding Rs. 28,55,000 be granted to the President out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur to 87 Manipur Budget and defray the charges which will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 1971, in respect of ‘Loans, and Advances’.’” SHRI DASARATHA DEB (Tripura Fast): Mr. Chairman, it is very unfortu- nate that this House has to discuse the Manipur Budget for 1976-71 and the supple- mentary demands. This has happened because of the failure of this Government to reconstitute the Manipur Assembly. They are deliberately denying the rights of the Manupur 7607८ who wanted that their Assembly should be constituted as early as possible. Elections to the Assembly = in Manipur could have been held simul- taneously with parliamentary clections. If that was done this House need not have taken the responsibility to pass this budget. The reason is simple. It is because this Government if afraid that it will not have a majority in that Assembly they are denying the peuple of Manipur to choose an Assembly. It is time that Government came forward with their proposal to have elections to the Manipur Assembly. People should not be feft under bureaucratic rule for such a long time. Last year the Prime Minister made an announcement in this House that she and her Government agreed in principle that Manipur and Tripura should be given full siate-hood ; she also said that the» were examining the details in that respect. पघा after that for more than one year the Government kopt silent on this matter. It is time that they took a definite decision in this matter. ft is about a year now when the Assembly in Manipur had been dissolved and Manipur is under bureaucratic rule. A series of repression 8 taking place and the people, particularly youths and students are put behind prison bars in many areas and some persons were transferred even to Tripura jails without giving them any facilities. No charge-sheets are given against those who are arrested. These are border States and they had always been neglected and their democratic rights were always denied. This is the type of demo- cracy that our Government is practicising in Manipur. During the President’s rule, the Administration has brought into force MARCH 25, 973 Demands a8 the Orissa Preventive Detention Order of 969 in this Union Territory. The Central Government itself did not keep this Preventive Detention Act in the whole of the State, but this bureaucratic rule of Manipur needed this Preventive Detention Act. Particularly they have borrowed it from Orissa just to suppress the democratic movement in that particular State. | demand that this thing must be withdrawn smimedi- ately from Manipur State. The same thing can be saul also about my State of Tripura. The Tripura Government has the same Orissa Preventive Detention Ordinance of i969, It has introduced itun our State also just to suppress the movement there, the democratic movement. Secondly, the parent Act, namely, the West Bengal Security Act of 4950, which was non-eaistent in West Bengal itsel? wap introduced in Manipur as well in our State of Tripura. Why is it necessary? fhe reason is vely simple, Feeryone can under- stand that only just to suppress the demo- cratic movement,- the working class, the peasantry, and other people the Govern- ment needed that Bill to put the people inside the prison bar without guving any chance for them te appear in court. That ts the thing which is going on. My friends over there are boasting of having a majority ny this Parliament and say that they are building a finer type of democracy in India. Is it a tiner wpe of demoeracy in India? Everybody in those public places talk in terms of election ; where they came to know that at least they can realise that the ruling party would be returned in a majority they held the elections, But if they are afraid of some slightest doubt in a place where the majority will not be theirs, they do not talk of any Assembly clection in Manipur; and in my State also. They ask other people. For instance, the Myscre Assembly, It is not yet dissolved. But the ruling party is now trying to hold elections there. But here in Manipur already the President's rule oxists. Thete is no question of reconstituting any existing Assembly. A new Assembly should be formed. Why are they taking time and why these peuple are not thinking in terns of having an election there in my Tripura State also? You are talking about Orissa. In my State of Tripura, the Congress fost all 89 = Manipur Budket and the seats. In my State of Tripura, we got a majority. Why shold you net ask Savhindialal’s Singh’s ministry to resign and have a new election and get a new trandatc fiom the people ? As many as 20 seats out of 30 Assembly seats in Tripura are curs ; we have got a maprity, Had the Tripura Assembly been dissolved and the Assenibly elections teld along with the Porliamentary elections, then a new Govern- ment would have been there The result would be otherwise. That is why Tsay that in those parts at least, the Parhament, the Government, should cone and see that these people get ther proper democratic rights and they are given more powers to manage themselves The demend for Statehood is there. 4६ iS Very puosular im those parts, We are discussing the demands fur grants for them here q do not dispute the ryghts and Propneues of this House = Pathament 38 (he sovercign body tut ts it physically possible to cxamine cvery nem of wotking of the Gosernment there and to give suggestions for them ® [tas mnupassthle. | Uhe Manipur Assemnbty hed been there. it would be proper. ‘They are local people , they know the nooks and corners af their own State. The, would be in a better posttiun to examine all the clauses and seo how the money is to be spent The other day the budget was placed before us JT hase gone through the budget ; and whatis the positron regarding certaia allocatan of funds for ‘Trpura in the matter of education, pariicwarly, tribal education ? Evan the report wax not reverved = The Finance Minister could not do anything or say how this money has been spent because the report is not coming from there. But the tendency and philosophy of this Government is not to give more power to the State ot to give Statehood to Manipur, Tripura and other Union Territories. They want to contro! पाला from the'cenfre, But this tendency should be curbed and this Dhilesophy shuuld be changed. Otherwise, you would be doing some injustice to these people, That is why I say more power should be given to the State. 11 the Centre is allowed to imterfere even in small affairs, the State cannot have any enthusiasm to undertake any developmental work in full ' swing. हु once again repeat these demands. Ait CHAITRA 4, 893 (SAKA) Demanals 90 the prisoners especially youths and students should be unconditionally releaséd. Even at present many more people are being anested there. Ail of them should be releesed. More noney should be given to the Manipur recple to develop thelr back- ward State. There are some backward tribals there. Frecal safeguards should be given. to these tribals who are handicapped, so that they can hft thenwelves tv a Sevel equal to the other people, Thirdfy, im- mediately Assembly elections should be held in Manipur. All the repressive Acts like the Orisa Preventive Detention Ordinance, West Bengal Sccuity Act ete. should be immediately withdrawn from that State and a proper atmosphere to develop democracy should be encouraged there, * MR. CHAIRMAN : There are two cut mouions. Are you moving them ? SHRI DASARATHA DEB: Yes, Sir. 3 beg to move: ‘that the demand for a supplemen- tary Grant of a sum not exceeding Rs 9,64, 00 m respect of General Ad- ministration be reduced by Rs. 100.”" {Failure of the Centre to hold Assembly lection in Manipur along with the recently held Parliamentary Election (Dh. “That the demand for a supplement- ary Grant of a sum not exceeding Rs 94,300, in respect of General Ad ministration be reduced by Rs. 100; {Repressive measures against the demo- crate people of Manipur (2)], MR. CHAIRMAN : The cut are also before the House. motions SHRI N, TOMBI SINGH $ (Inner Mani- pur) : Sir, this is my maiden speech as 8 member of this House. would like to say a few words in support of the Manipur budget There are a number of units in the country which are small in area and population and also backward in economi« cally, but such units have defied the normal yardsticks while deciding their political indi- viduality and status. Manipur and Tripura and also Meghalaya are some of such units which | happen to Know more or less closely. Our country being very big and variegated in culture and in lingvistic groups, $i Manipur Budget and {Shri N, Tombi Singh] I am afraid, many of us could be compared with the proverbial blind men trying to see the whole of the elephant. Each one of us sees his own arcas and tries to impase his own reason and comprehension upon the rest of his fellawmen. Perhaps it is inevi- table because of the big size of our country, too many cultures and Janguages. Small units like Manipur, Tripura and Meghalaya have been struggling to attain their political individuality although there has been oppo- sition from the othe: angles on the ground of economic non-viabilits Now that the Government of India had accepted in principle the demand by the small units for full-fledged statehood | think the position is different. After conferring on these small units the status of statchvod, the Government of India and also the people would still be feelmg that these usits are financially weak. Steps have to be taken to remove this feeling. We are very happy that the Government of India are considering this issue of statehood on a priority basis, the Bilis are being prepared and they will come before us very soon. But after the conferment of the status of statehood to these small areas, specially to my unit which I happen to know more closely, steps will have to be taken to improve the financial and other economic resources of those units so that they will become self-sufficient, because this is the only way to keep them useful to our country. Now i would fike to make an emphatuc reference to the development of that unit in the agricultural sphere. In our part of the country, because of the climatic conditions and topography, draught and monsoon follow one another in quick succession. This valley is at an altitude of 2,400 1, and dur- ing the monsoon, which covers six months of the year, water comes in such big torrents and floods occur very often during those six months. After टि monsnon, after the fiood season, the entice valley which is the main area of agriculture, which is the most fertile area, remains dry and, therefore, that fertile land cannot be utilized for agri- culture for want of water. So, in order to improve the agricultural productivity of this area we have to se¢ that special measures of irrigation are planned and implemented earnestly, MARCH 25, 974 Demands 92 Coming to eduction, a large number of schools and colleges have comd up after independence. In the sphere of post- graduate education the people have been crying hoarse for a university centre as a beginning towards a fullflaged uaiversity as was done in Simla. After so many years in I969 the University Grants Commission accepted the demand for this but nothing has been indivated in the Budget. The Budget has been presented in a routine fashion and no special provision has been made in this and many other inyportant respects. The future of this region 25 very much associated with the development of its culture and its preservation and, for the matter of that with, the development of the local language, Manipuri, wiich was the language of the court, the official language, before Manipur merged in the Indian Union in ‘1949, Very little provision has been made for further development of this language and to sinciude it m= the Lighth Schedule. 1 wmperauve that in order to consolidate the existence and rapid growth ot this region the Incal language has got to be developed and it should be given a place in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution along with the other languages. hope, the Government of India will give special con- sideration to this. Regarding the election to the Union territory Assembly, which my hon. friend from Tripura mentioned, 4 am afraid, | have to look at this point from a slightly different angic. It was not, so for as we uoderstand, the Government of India which delayed the election to the Union territory Assembly. The House will remember that since I969 the people of Manipur with all the political parties combined were हड्डा ling for statehood and at one stage it was decided that all parties refraim from any type of elections held under the present regime, that is, as a Union territory. When the Lok Sabha election came, there was a very heated debate in the then existing all parties co-ordinating body as to whether we should demand elections to the Union terri- toty Assetnbly too. Except in the case of one local party, all the national parties agreed that the Union territory clections 93 Manipur Budget and = CHAITRA $ 4893 (SAKA) should not be held until we have statehood conferred पा. Manipur. In the context of the Government of India’s acceptance in principle of our demand, it was felt that we should not move for an clectin under the Union territory Act, because the Union terrilory Assembly was fall of limitations and it was a democracy only apparently. We had tried it. Therefore, we did not find it necessary and all the parties agreed that we should not have it any further. That is how, so far as we understand, the Assembly election was not held. There was no political climate for such an election in Manipur. With these few words I would like to conclude my speech. sit फारखण्डे राय (धोती): मान्यवर, सैद्धांतिक रूप से भारत बहुजातीय (मल्टी नेशनल) कौर बहुभाषीय (मल्टी-लिगुझ्नल) राष्ट्र है। इसके प्रत्येक विशिष्ट भूखण्ड की उपराष्ट्रीय विशिष्टता हैं। इन सब की भरने कता में भी एक विशेष राष्ट्रीय एवं सास्कृतिक एकता युगों से चली त् रही है। यही भारतीय राष्ट्रीय सांस्कृतिक एकता का मूल स्रोत है इन्हीं विशिष्ट उप-प्र चलों में मणिपुर क्षेत्र है - इसकी सामाजिक जीवन की विशेषतायें एवं भाषा, कला, शिल्प, नृत्य एवं संस्कृति की बि शिष्टता यें भारत-विख्यात हैं। यह सामान्य झंचल है। यहां किसी प्रकार का जन-असंतोष राष्ट्रीय सुरक्षा एवं ऐक्य के लिए घातक होगा । हमें मुख्यतया इस हृ ष्टि कोश से इस प्रश्न पर विचार करना चाहिए | आज की मशहूर की स्थिति के लिए मैं भूतपूर्व गृह-कार्य मन्त्री श्री चारा को जिम्मे- दार समझता हैं। यह कहानी सर्व-विदित है कि वहां एक जनवादी सरकार जो बहुमत से चुनी गई, स्थापित थी t लेकिन किन्हीं कारणों से उसके अन्दर एक ब्रितानी हुआ कौर कुछ लोग सरकारी पक्ष छोड़ कर विरोधी पक्ष में झा बैंठे । पुराने विरोधी पक्ष के लीग शौर सगे विरोधी पक्ष बाले मिलकर बहुमत में हो गए t स्वाभाविक था और उचित यही था कि केंद्रीय Demands 94 सरकार को कोई अनुचित हृस्तवीष उसमें नहीं करना चाहिए था और उस बहुमत को सरकार बनाने का भीतर मिलना चाहिए था। लेकिन जब वहां के जन-नेता यहां आए, केंद्रीय सरकार के उच्च श्रश्चिकारियों से और मन्त्रियों से मिले तब भी उनकी शांकांग्रों का कोई समाधा नहीं किया गया । केंद्रीय सरकार तुली दुई थी और उस समय उसकी एक विशिष्ट नीति थी कि किसी तरह भी वहां गैर-कांग्रेसी सरकार कायम न होने दिया जाये भर वही नीति राज भी चल रही है। खास करके जन संसदीय चुनाव हुए कौर उसके साथ साथ बहुत जल्दी की भंग की गई विधान सवारों, उड़ीसा, तामिलनाडु कौर बंगाल में विधान सभा के चुनाव करा दिए गए, उनमें कोई दिक्कत नहीं पड़ी, विशेषकर बंगाल जहां की स्थिति के बारे में अनेक प्रकार की बातें पूरे देश में विख्यात थीं तो कोई बजह नहीं थी कि क्यों मणिपुर में उस समय चुनाव मही कराया गया । इसका जवाब माननीय शुक्ला जी जो इस समय यहां बैठे हुए है अपने उत्तर के समय दें कि क्‍या विशेषता थी वहां जिसके कारण वहाँ चुनाव नहीं कराया गया जब कि लगभग एक साल से ऊपर समय हो गया वहाँ की विधान सभा तोड़ दी गई थी ? मणिपुर मे लोकतन्त्रीय चुनाव के लिए जितने भी आन्दोलन चले, मजदूरों, किसानों कौर विशेषकर छात्र व युवकों के उस को वहां की सरकार ते, वहां के शॉसनरूढ़ लोगों ने केन्द्रीय सरकार के इशारे पर क्र रता- पूर्वक दमन किया है। मैं उसका घोर विरोध करता हूं कौर वह रवैया दमन का राज भी जारी है। जनता की ध्वज दबा अवद्य दी गई है लेकिन वह हमेशा के लिए दबाई सहीं जा सकती, किसी भी युग शासकों को यह बात भूलती नहीं चाहिए । मणिपुर मुख्यतया पर्वतीय क्षेत्र है। उसमें विशेष भूजल हैं जहां पटेलों का बाहुल्य है। वहां पशुपालन धौर वनारोपणा पर सुरूर ध्यान देता चाहिए। इसके लिए इस राय-व्यस्क में ‘95 Mantpur Budget and थी फारखण्डे राय] जो धनराशि स्वीकृत की गई हैं वह नगण्य है। जहां तक कि मैं समझ पाया हूं !4 लाख से ऊपर धनराशि उसमें नहीं दी गई है। पहाड़ों की ढलानों पर जहा खेती मही हो सकती वहां मुख्यतया केवल मणिपुर में ही नहीं बल्कि हिन्दुस्तान के सभी पर्वतीय श्र चलों में बनों के उत्पादन पर बहुत ध्यान देता चाहिए क्योंकि ढलानों पर और कोई चीज नहीं हो सकती। लेकिन बसों का वहाँ न लगाया जाना और ऐसे कैच जहां खेती हो सकती है उन पर बन लगाने की योजना सरकारों की 24 साल से रही है जिससे हानि ही अधिक हुई है, लाभ कम पहुँचा है इसलिए पब तीय क्षेत्रों म ेपहाड़ो की ढलानों पर युद्ध स्तर पर बना रोप शा करना चाहिए उसके साथ उद्योग के क्षेत्र में मणिपुर मुख्यतया कुटीर उद्योग के विकास पर ही बल रहना चाहिए | उस अर बल के जो परम्परागत कुटीर उद्योग हैं उन्हीं के विकास पर बल देना चाहिए जो राज भी उपयोगी हो सकते है | मान्यवर, मणिपुर या इस तरह के पूर्वाचल ों के रहे हमेशा ही उठते रहे हैं कौर आगे और उठेंगे t भारत के स्थायी प्रशासकीय विभाजन के लिए एक पुनर्जीवन आयोग बरहे व्यापक आंदोलन के बाद स्थापित किया गया था। उम्र के फलस्वरूप भारत का भाषाविज्ञान प्रदेश निर्माण हुआ है। उससे कमियां रह गई थी 1 बम्बई, पंजाब, द्विभाषिक आदेश बने । भीतर संघर्ष के बाद उस उ का सुधार किया गया कौर महा- राष्ट्र, गुजरात पजाब शर हरियाना सीमित हुए | छिदी भाषाभाषी भारत में असन्तोष हैं। उसकी पअ्रभिव्यक्ति अलग द्र लग प्रदेशों के निर्माण की मांग के रूप में हो रही है। जैसे विशाल हरि प्राता पं तीय प्रदेश, भोजपुर प्रदेश, भारखन्ड क्षेत्र, बुन्देशस५ड, छत्तीसगढ़ जिससे हमारे राज्य मन्नी जी विशेष तौर से परिक्षित हैं, जौर, विमर्श, महाकौशल, भहामालव MARCH 25, 17t आदि भारी | समय रहते चेतना चाहिए। देर से चेतने पर हानि होती रही है। आगे ऐसा ते हो, इसके लिए भेरी बलपूर्वक मांग है कि समस्त हिन्दी भाषा-भाषी भारत के वैज्ञानिक, भौगोलिक, उपसाषीय, प्रशासकीय सुविधा के दृष्टिकोण से पुन विभाजन एवं सुसंगत प्रदेशों के पुनर्निमाण के लिए एक उच्चतमग्तरीय एच पूर्ण सम्पूर्ण पु नर्सो मन आयोग स्थापित किया जाये 1 इसी के बाद उत्तर प्रदेश के पूर्वांचल प्रौढ़ बिहार के पश्षिमायल के समस् मि लस और विलयन से भोजपुर प्रदेश का निर्माण होगा। अगन में मैं जोरदार शब्दों में निम्न मांगों को दोहराता g—(t) मणिपुर को पूर्णा राज्य का दर्जा दिया जाये। (2) वहा चुनाव शि शीघ्र कराए जाय । (9) उसके सामान्य स्थिति शरीर पिछड़ पन को देखते हुए उसके खतुमू्ती ली और संगीन विकास के लिए केंद्र से बराबर सहायता दी जाय ! THE MINISTFR OF STATI IN THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE (SHRI VIDYA CHARAN SHUKLA): [ am grateful to the hun. Members who have taken part in this small debate and only some general questions have been raised. The first question that was raised by Shri Deb and also, I think. by Shri Tombi Singh, धड़े about the statehood for Manipur. In the last Lok Sabha which was dissolved st was announced on behalf of the Govern- ment that we have accepted the demand of the people of Manipur and Tripura to give them statehood and we would wurk out the detatis of the new status. Having had some experiqnce in the Hose Ministry about the administration and the problems of these Union Territories, | know what a formidable job it is to launch them inw statehood. Shri Tombi Singh and Shri Deb would realise the complexity of the problems that face the Union Territories, Apart from the local political problems and the other pro- blems of security and other matters that crop up in these two territories, the political situation has also not been very stable as has been seen in the last fow years and duritig 97 Manipur. Mudget a CHATTRA.¢, 4888 (8K) the elections and even after the elections to the Union Territories were held. Shri Tombi will bear me out that there fad been a consistent demand in Manipur that no elec- tions should be held in Manipur under the existing set up. The demand of the people is that the election should be held in Manipur only after the new set up has come into being, after it becomes a fullfledged State. They want that then only the election shold be held. That is the reason why the election to the Manipar Assembly was not held along with the clecties for the Lok Sabha. 35.00 brs. We are committed to the policy of granting Statehood to these two Union Tertitones. There are various problems like finanaal viebiuty, the administrative system, national security, internal stability and *0 on and we are going into ali these points very carefully and we shall bsiag forward a suit- bie legislation before this Honourable House 50 that these long-cherished demands of the peop'e of these two Union Territories can be fulfilled as quickly as possible. Sir, the other point made was sbout re- pression ,I do not think there is any re- pression, The hon. Member would know that at least in Manipur there have been tremendous amount of upsurge, because of the Naga underground movement in the ad- joining Nagaland. The border of Manipur ig also inhabited by some tribes of Nagas and there have been many problems in this regard. Also, Manipur as such is geographi- cally divided into two parts, the valley and the hilly parts. There have been certain difficulties— sociological as well as political— in this division and these have got to be properly adjusted in the new set up that we are devising for these Union Terri- tories. Thetefore, if certain security measures had to be taken, that should not be हड्डा ed 88 repressive measures. That is neces- sary for rdintaining internal security in the area to see that proper law and ordet is maintained and the development activities that are taking place there are not ham- pered. About the irrigation facilities mentioned by the hon. Member, the Loktak Irrigation Devveds 98 System, at a cost of about Ra. 2 laighs has been taken up in the current year 97i-72. In addition to that we have allotted Rs. 7 lakhs for minor irrigation schemes in this Poteet that we have presented before the ouse. About the other points mentioned. by the hon. Member, we are sendiag a study team from Nehru, University to lmphal and we have takem up these problems in right ear- nest and | hope we shall be able to do some- thing: in thie direction, after we get the re- port of the Stady Team. Shri Jharkbande Rai, while talking about Statehood, brought in several other points and one point that he made was about for- mation of Regianal States like Bundelkhand, Maha Vidarbha and many other demands like that. ¥ would like him to study the regional papers because probably the national Press has not brought out these matiers so prominently. 4 do not refer here to Telen- gana. I am mentioinng with regard to demands like Maha Koshal, Bundelkhand, Maha Malaw and others. The candidates were alf defeated. They did not get any proper support whatsoever. Telengana is a separate question altogether. He did not specifically mention Tclengana. I am not touching upon that question now, So far as Telengana is concerned, that ia a separate question. But in Madhya Pradesh or Uttar Pradesh or in Rajasthan or even in Maharashtra, wherever separatist demands were made, as for instance, by the Maha Vidarbha Samiti or the Chattisgarh Samiti and so on, al the candidates who had stood for such demands had lost their security deposits, and they did not get even a semblance of support from the people. Therefore, this demand for the setting up of a new States Re-organisation Commission seems completely out of place and completely uncalled for, and I do not think that there is any necessity for any such exercise in this direction. As we have proved already, this House is capable of taking cognizance of strong feelings and demands of the people by con- stitutions! aud regutar legal methods. We can grant Statehood to territories wherever it # feasible or nectosary of aarranted, as we have'done ti the vase of Himachal Pradesh, where unanimonsty the attion of the Government was welcomed by all gectionn of the Hlousy, aad the announce. e Manipur Bidget and Demands [Shri Vidye' Charen Shukla} ment of the proposal for grant of Statehood to Tripura and Manipur was also generally welcomed ‘in the House. Therefore, it is clear that we are erovtiraged to examine these questions and we want to settle these questions as expeditidutly ‘ts we can ; when- ever there is any such need, and we feel and the Parliament of India feels that aby question regarding any particular territory or area should be taken into consideration, that can be taken into consideration, and Parlia- ment can take a suitable decision on that, and no Commission as such seems to be necessary. With these words, ] hope that Demands will be granted by the House. the MR. CHAIRMAN : I shall now put the Demands for Grants on Account relating to Manipur to vote. The question is : “That the respective sums not exceed- ing the amounts shown in the third column of the Order Paper, be granted to the President, on account, out of the Consolidated Fund of Union Territory of Manipur for or towards defraying the charges which wilf come in course of payment during the year ending the 3st day of March, 1972, in respect of the heads of Demands entered in the second column thereof against Demands Nos. ! to “ar The motion was adopted. MR. CHAIRMAN: I shall now put cut motions Nos. ! and 2 to the Demands for Supplementary Grants to the vote of the Howse. The cut motions were put and negatived. MR. CHAIRMAN; I shail now put the Supplementary Demands for Grants (Manipur) to vote, The question is : “That the respective Supplementary ‘gums not exceeding the gmounts shown in the third column of the Order Papar be granted to the President out of the Coosalidated Fund of the Union territory + ef Manipur to defray the charges which “MARCH 25. 9r- Manlor Aspropriation 200 (Vote on Account) Bill te will come in course of payment during the year ending the 3ist day of March, 1971, In respect of the following Demands entered in the second column thereof Demands Nos. 1, 4, 5, 7, 9 to 16, 18, 20, 2, 23 to 28, 30 to 33, 36, 38 and 44." The motion was adopted, 4 28.0 hes, MANIPUR APPROPRIATION (VOTE ON ACCOUNT) *BILL, 1975 THE MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE (SHRI VIDYA CHARAN SHUKLA): I beg to move for leave to introduce a Bill to provide for the withdrawal of certain sums from and out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur for the services of a part of the financial year 1971-72, MR. CHAIRMAN : The question is “That leave be granted to introduce a Bill to provide for the withdrawal of certain sums from ard out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union territory of Manipur for the services of a part of the financial year 1971-72." The motion was adopted. SHRI VIDYA CHARAN SHUKLA: I introducet the Bill. I beg to move : “That the Bill to provide for the withdrawal of certain sums from and out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union Territory of Manipur for the services of 8 part of the financial year 1971-72, ह... taken into consideration.” "MR. CHAIRMAN : The question is : “That the Bill to provide for the with- drawal of certain sums from and out of the Consolidated Fund of the Union Territory of Manipur for the services of part of the financial year 1971-72, be taken into consideration.”” he fhe motion was adopted. —